3 ms·
Since this is a clearly meaningless list, it doesn't really need to be sorted alphabetically. I think it would have been more fitting to sort the list numerical
by CGamesPlay 17y ago
Since this is a clearly meaningless list, it doesn't really need to be sorted alphabetically. I think it would have been more fitting to sort the list numerically.
- graywh 17y agoThen you'd just sort by length, too.
- yan 17y agoWon't numerically and alphabetically in this case be almost identical?
- harpastum 17y agoKinda, but not really. What you'd end up with is alphabetical sublists organized by length—any word with 4 letters is greater than any word with 3 letters (like in base ten, where any 4-digit number is greater than any 3-digit number).