2 ms·
Exactly. Not to mention that in any large scale system your functional and integration tests are the most useful for producing high quality software than simply
by jeletonskelly 12y ago
Exactly. Not to mention that in any large scale system your functional and integration tests are the most useful for producing high quality software than simply having static types.
- the_af 12y agoNo-one is arguing that you should just have static types and nothing else. The argument is that static types and testing are better than just testing. After all, static types are a kind of test that the compiler verifies for you, leaving you free to focus on the rest of the tests. I'd say in any large scale system, dynamic typing is a risk (though there are ways of mitigating this risk, of course).