3 ms·
I really don't like the idea of running an editor written in JS - I just tried out the latest stable build and it's still very much slower than Sublime Text 3.
by mrmondo 12y ago
I really don't like the idea of running an editor written in JS - I just tried out the latest stable build and it's still very much slower than Sublime Text 3.
- unknownian 12y agoI get that they have a lot of JS devs and there's a big community but if they went with Ruby I would have been so much more inclined to stick with it. Performance-wise perhaps it would not have been better. Emacs it is for me.
- rurounijones 12y agoJust in case you don't know about it. If you are looking for an editor written, and extensible, in (j)ruby then there is always http://redcareditor.com/ http://redcareditor.com/ Project is dead but the program is a pretty fully-fledged text editor from what I have heard.
- peteretep 12y agoI have a suspicion that every great Perl, Ruby, and Python developer can write reasonable JS, which actually makes it an even bigger community still.
- kbenson 12y agoI have a feeling that that's correct, but to the same degree that every great Perl, Ruby, and Python developer can write reasonable code in any of Perl, Ruby, and Python given good reference docs. The languages aren't really all that different if you take a macro view (and include lisps, static typed languages, etc).
- noarchy 12y agoMuch slower, indeed. You don't have to introduce a very large file before Atom starts to crawl. And good luck executing a search on such a file. I like the look and feel of Atom quite a bit, though, and I'm hopeful that the performance issues get worked out in time.
- pjmlp 12y agoWhat to expect from something wrapped on a browser playing native application.