3 ms·
And I think dumb pipes open for everyone is best. After all ... it would be inconvenient if your utility company told you what can you use your electricity for
by venomsnake 12y ago
And I think dumb pipes open for everyone is best.
After all ... it would be inconvenient if your utility company told you what can you use your electricity for.
- rayiner 12y agoIt would be inconvenient if my ISP was keeping 100 year old infrastructure running like my power company. Or refusing to upgrade aging lead pipes leaking poison into the drinking water like my water company. The U.S. has a multi-trillion infrastructure deficit, and regulating utilities as dumb services is a huge part of that. Legislating the wires into "dumb pipes" has certain advantages in terms of openness, but there's no money in building dumb pipes, and these pipes are expensive and must be continually upgraded, much more so than other kinds of utilities.
- venomsnake 12y agoNo its not the reason. You could always price the service high enough to get some sane ROI. It is zero risk investment. I don't mind paying for what my service is worth. I mind giving someone else control over my digital life.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- rayiner 12y agoUtilities don't set their own rates, for obvious reasons. Public rate-setting boards do, and they are beholden to municipal politics, which target the lowest-common denominator. If you tried to raise rates to upgrade the network, you'd be shouted down by people talking about old folks on fixed incomes. What do you think is going to happen at a rate-setting meeting? For every young nerd who thinks the utility should invest in fiber, how many people like my parents will be there (who wanted to switch from FiOS to cable to get Indian channels)?