5 ms·
You ad hominem attack aside, whatever wording may or may not be in the regulations will not matter near as much as how things will actually be implemented, and
by cubano 12y ago
You ad hominem attack aside, whatever wording may or may not be in the regulations will not matter near as much as how things will actually be implemented, and how these implemented changes will affect us all here on the web.
For example, there are 1000's of crazy laws on the books here in the US. Plenty of websites document "laws" like "it's a misdemeanor to walk your dog on Sunday within 100 feet of a church"
Since no police actually enforce these type of laws, the wording in the statue goes unnoticed...no one cares.
But if they did, all hell would break loose and the current local officials would probably quickly change them.
That is the gist of the direction I was trying to take.
- mortehu 12y ago> Plenty of websites document "laws" like "it's a misdemeanor to walk your dog on Sunday within 100 feet of a church" I recently learned that these are actually mostly jokes, and have never been real laws anywhere.
- ebbv 12y agoI repeat your attitude sucks. That's not an ad hominem attack. An ad hominem attack is an attack directed at your person, I'm attacking the nature and premise of your comments; they come from a place of useless negativity. Your attitude is basically "This means nothing because only the implementation and enforcement means anything." Which is just absurd. Of course the implementation and enforcement matter, but the regulations matter as well.
- cubano 12y agoYes, but of course, my attitude is a part of my "person". Perhaps it is you who should lighten up a bit, my friend.
- Karunamon 12y ago"Your attitude sucks" is not an ad hominem argument, "Your argument is incorrect because your attitude sucks" is. The first is an observation and has no bearing on the facts.