3 ms·
http://www.wsj.com/articles/jostling-begins-as-fccs-net-neutrality-vote-nears-1424819532 http://www.wsj.com/articles/jostling-begins-as-fccs-net-neut... """Goo
by smtddr 12y ago
http://www.wsj.com/articles/jostling-begins-as-fccs-net-neutrality-vote-nears-1424819532 http://www.wsj.com/articles/jostling-begins-as-fccs-net-neut...
"""Google has grown. And strong net neutrality rules are now no longer a top company priority. They could even be a hindrance. Officially, Google hasn’t taken a formal position on the president’s net neutrality proposal."""
I fail to understand how this could hurt Google. If ISPs start modifying speed and/or access to certain domains I can only see that as damaging for Google. The only thing I can think of is the typical pattern of a company becoming hugely successful then begin seeking to change the laws that allowed them to grow so nobody else can follow the path. Kinda like cutting the bridge after you've crossed it.
I hope that's not what E.Schmidt is thinking...
- unprepare 12y agoI think you are on the right track If you are google with billions in the bank, what does it matter to you if Comcast wants to charge you a little bit more? The real effect is that entrenched powers get further entrenched because of less access to alternatives. Lets say Comcast wanted to charge search providers 500million dollars. Thats not a lot of money from Googles search engine profits. But how much is 500 million of Bings budget? Yahoos? DuckDuckGo? I would be surprised if every search provider was willing and able to pay fees like this.