2 ms·
This is actually kind of the opposite thing. Individuals should be able to have privacy from the government; but the government works for the people and should
by exelius 12y ago
This is actually kind of the opposite thing. Individuals should be able to have privacy from the government; but the government works for the people and should be more transparent.
There are definitely things that should be classified - but in classifying everything, you run the risk of the "classified" designation losing its meaning. In Citizenfour, this was something that Snowden explicitly stated: he was leaving it to the discretion of the reporters which information should be published and what should not, because his biases weren't necessarily correct. But this is because so much classified information shouldn't be classified that someone like Snowden can't really differentiate between what is important to keep secret and what isn't.
- LLWM 12y agoNo more than encrypting information causes encryption to lose its meaning. Something that should be declassified still can be. It just means that the default state is different. Would you say that if your innocuous slashdot browsing was encrypted even though it "shouldn't be", someone like you or me would become unable to differentiate between what is important to keep secret and what isn't?