4 ms·

Thanks. Seems to me these anecdotes have to do with humans. So is the implicit assumption that machines will do what humans are doing ('bad' things) but at sev

Thanks. Seems to me these anecdotes have to do with humans. So is the implicit assumption that machines will do what humans are doing ('bad' things) but at several orders of magnitude faster and without the ability to comprehend longer-term consequences of their actions any more than humans do at the present time?

SquidMagnet 12y ago
Sort of. 'Bad' here is of course an extremely subjective term. And it may not be the case that the machines do not understand the longer-term consequences of their actions; they could understand full well, but they could know that the preservation of humanity is not important (for whatever reason). So, we might not matter to them. We matter to us though, so that would be a problem for us as things stand now.
- veryluckyxyz 12y ago
  Thanks.