If the statement was only given as a reason why cheating is prevalent nowadays it would be an explanation. To take the next step and use that explanation to ra

If the statement was only given as a reason why cheating is prevalent nowadays it would be an explanation. To take the next step and use that explanation to rationalize one's own cheating makes it is a justification (or rationalization, whichever you prefer). GP certainly used it as his justification. > Because, I agree: if there wasn't such a societal emphasis on material goods (ie the Benz), there would be less embezzlement. Noting that that relationship might exist is entirely different from saying "this relationship exists therefore I shall embezzle."