4 ms·
This would be anti competitive as soon as the app store had a majority market share. If it became too difficult for them "Charge Facebook $100mm" they would re
by robmcm 12y ago
This would be anti competitive as soon as the app store had a majority market share.
If it became too difficult for them "Charge Facebook $100mm" they would replace support with a lower quantity web app and blame Apple.
The reality is that Apple don't have as much interest in the web anymore, they have achieved their goal with web standards (removing enough of a dependency on Flash so they didn't have to support it). They have no need to make the web a successful app platform, so why waste effort on it.
For Google it's part of their core business, look at Angular, Closure tools, Dart, GWT etc...
- empthought 12y ago> For Google it's part of their core business No, it's not. https://investor.google.com/financial/tables.html https://investor.google.com/financial/tables.html Total Advertising Revenues: $59,056,000,000 Total Other Revenues: $6,945,000,000
- robmcm 12y agoHow do they generate such high advertising revenues? People using google services, allowing them to build detailed portfolios to sell to advertisers. All of this happens though the web. Native apps and things like android are just a way to drive people back to the web.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- empthought 12y agoMost of it comes from AdWords, i.e. Google Search. Angular, GWT, Closure, and Dart have nothing to do with it. They're also all essentially abandonware from Google's point of view, because management has rightly realized they have nothing to do with their core business.
- robmcm 12y agoWhat are the tools to manage those services written in? Angular was borne out of AdWords tooling, just as React was from FB advertising. Now consider Google have chromebooks, where those apps must run on the web.