3 ms·
> we are actually trying to define intelligence through IQ tests, for example Fail. IQ tests only measure how well you do on IQ tests. > The problem here is
by downer 19y ago
> we are actually trying to define intelligence through IQ tests, for example
Fail. IQ tests only measure how well you do on IQ tests.
> The problem here is that not every human being is intelligent
Unless they're in a vegetative state, they are more intelligent than any artificial system, so far.
> Is that the way you formulate tasks for software engineers?
The only way to make a specification so precise that it does exactly what you want is to implement it, and then the code itself becomes the specification.
- mojuba 19y agoSo, what you mean by saying something is more intelligent than something else? What criteria are you using to evaluate that? And yes, it's the way programming works - when you know what you are trying to achieve. Software is about input and output and unless they are deterministic, you can't write code.
- downer 19y ago> So, what you mean by saying something is more intelligent than something else? Obviously people say that all the time despite our lack of a definition for exactly what it is, so we apparently don't need an exact definition. > and unless they are deterministic, you can't write code. You might be interested to know that the behavior of your OS isn't deterministic once you add a second CPU.