6 ms·
This article's title got me thinking that Apple, as a company, could actually be interested in suppressing the advancement of the web. Their apps are a shocking
by kolbe 12y ago
This article's title got me thinking that Apple, as a company, could actually be interested in suppressing the advancement of the web. Their apps are a shockingly effective alternative to the internet, and the store becomes more comprehensive by the year.
Even at this point, Apple's apps can replace all but some long-tail usages. So, despite the fact that suppressing the progress of the web will hurt the user experience of its own web browser users, that affects users of all operating systems fairly equally. But in the meantime, Apple can keep improving their OS, the app development process, &c; and they could steadily crowd out the web until iOS becomes the primary (or, if Apple gets it way, the solitary) source of networked information distribution/consumption. And after a while, all of what are currently thought of as web or web 2.0 companies would all be at the mercy of Apple. They would, for all intents and purposes, privatize the web.
- xyby 12y ago> apps can replace all but some long-tail usages Yeah some long-tail usages like everything those 90% of phone and tablet users do that are not on iOS. And 100% of what desktop users do. And 100% of what laptop users do.
- kolbe 12y agoAre you kidding me? 90% of what people do in iOS is in an app. Email (app), chatting (apps), Facebook (app), dating (app), Instagram (app), Twitter (app), news (app), games (apps). I could go on for quite a while until I start to encounter things that aren't in an app (e.g. Hacker News).
- sbochins 12y agoThere are some pretty nice HN apps on iOS.
- mcintyre1994 12y agoTo be fair, the actual claim was "Apple's apps can replace all but some long-tail usages." which is blatantly false. I'm not an iOS user so I might be a little off - but of your list Apple's apps do Email, chatting (for their protocol anyway), maybe they have a news app? You can do pretty much everything outside the long tail with apps - usually with the better experience (outside of the long tail again) but they're mostly not Apple's apps.
- kolbe 12y agoRead again. I'm not saying that they're Apple's native apps.
- xyby 12y agoI said nothing about iOS users. I said: Most people don't use iOS.
- Demiurge 12y agoThis can't possibly happen because regardless of how big Apple is, it is tiny compared to the Internet and everyone who depends on the open Internet, from Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix to whitehouse.gov and data.nasa.gov
- kolbe 12y agoThat's not what I'm saying. Amazon, Facebook, Google and Netflix would be victims of this. People would still use their services, but they'd use their services through the dedicated iOS app, not through a browser. Then Apple will have become a necessary middle man for the consumption of the content that those companies distribute. And who knows what Apple would be able to get away with at that point. Charge Facebook $100mm whenever the push out an updated version of their app? All Amazon purchases must be made with ApplePay? Who knows.
- robmcm 12y agoThis would be anti competitive as soon as the app store had a majority market share. If it became too difficult for them "Charge Facebook $100mm" they would replace support with a lower quantity web app and blame Apple. The reality is that Apple don't have as much interest in the web anymore, they have achieved their goal with web standards (removing enough of a dependency on Flash so they didn't have to support it). They have no need to make the web a successful app platform, so why waste effort on it. For Google it's part of their core business, look at Angular, Closure tools, Dart, GWT etc...
- empthought 12y ago> For Google it's part of their core business No, it's not. https://investor.google.com/financial/tables.html https://investor.google.com/financial/tables.html Total Advertising Revenues: $59,056,000,000 Total Other Revenues: $6,945,000,000
- robmcm 12y agoHow do they generate such high advertising revenues? People using google services, allowing them to build detailed portfolios to sell to advertisers. All of this happens though the web. Native apps and things like android are just a way to drive people back to the web.
- romaniv 12y ago> Their apps are a shockingly effective alternative to the internet To some, very limited, parts of the Web. I think this statement is very telling in terms of illustrating how people's perception of "The Internet" has shifted over the years, along with the notions about is its overall purpose. Ad frankly, I liked the old notion (the one that centered around communication, rather than "apps and services") much better.
- fauigerzigerk 12y agoThat's not going to happen for multiple reasons. First of all, iOS market share in 2014 was 15%. You can actually stop reading here if you like. Second, we only use tens of apps, but most of us use hundereds if not thousands of websites per year, because most provide content, not applications. Installing an app for each of them does not scale. And third, apps are currently uncrawlable and hence there is no way to search for server side content inside and across them. It's not unimaginable for the App Store to solve this one eventually.