4 ms·
Sounds reasonable. We may just have to take the hit. It might also be a good idea to float around a limited number of beta passes.
by fjabre 17y ago
Sounds reasonable. We may just have to take the hit. It might also be a good idea to float around a limited number of beta passes.
- ErrantX 17y agoOh yeh; releasing it in a limited way is the best move in my eyes. I mostly suggested that approach because you said immediate money wasn't a huge concern (always good!). The way I see it, if you make a limited initial beta for a reasonable length of time (say 3 months) and make sure you pick people who will actively use the service (that's the hard bit) then you: - have an active user base who are very highly likely to convert to immediate paid accounts, especially if you sweeten it just a tad for them as beta users :D - get final stage beta testing while still on limited release - get your first real public product feedback; always useful for setting a price that is fair but not off putting! (can I ask what it is your putting together? If it's too early just say no :D)
- fjabre 17y agoSomething along the lines of a highrisehq.com competitor. We're about a 6 weeks away from a private beta launch.. So pricing is coming up quite a bit. =)
- ErrantX 17y agosounds interesting; add my email (it's in my profile) to your lists if you have any - that's something my employer might be interested in in the near future.
- fjabre 17y agoWill do. Thanks ErrantX. You've inspired me to seriously consider putting up a splash page asking for email addresses - to be notified when it's released.