This is an interesting line of thought, but you'd be better off if you followed it to its conclusion. Assuming the same level of property taxes, others must pa

This is an interesting line of thought, but you'd be better off if you followed it to its conclusion. Assuming the same level of property taxes, others must pay more, making the state unattractive long-term. Does this mean overall tax revenue declines eventually? This statement is true for everywhere, not just CA. Why should it be different here?