3 ms·
Out of curiosity, why the title 700 Billion? What is the purpose of this in how it relates to the article? Regarding the article, yea, seems pretty standard. S
by joslin01 12y ago
Out of curiosity, why the title 700 Billion? What is the purpose of this in how it relates to the article?
Regarding the article, yea, seems pretty standard. Sorry you didn't get the job
- rscott 12y ago"A few people asked me to write about my experience of interviewing for a job at Apple—the 700 billion worth company—so here it is."
- joslin01 12y agoI still don't understand, but ok, thanks. That's a great descriptor of Apple (of which there are many), but doesn't point anywhere toward a rationale for titling an interview experience as "700 billion". I'm not trying to say titles need to make logical sense, but they usually should make some sense
- presty 12y agoit refers to Apple's current Market Cap
- staticfish 12y agoI think he understands that, but is wondering why that is relevant for the topic at all.
- toephu2 12y agoit's called link bait.
- stevenjohns 12y agoIt could be for a number of reasons. 1. OP wanted to emphasize what it is like to interview at a company which has a lot of resources to invest into interviews - one of the things mentioned was committing multiple people for a full day to just interview him, as well as willing to bear a high initial cost (travel, hotel) to interview him. 2. OP wanted to detail the interview process of such a financially successful company: who they hire, why they hire that person, how they find and select candidates that have contributed to that high financial success. 3. OP wanted a crafty title beyond "My interview at Apple" 4. More likely to be clicked on, shared, commented or voted on (i.e clickbait).
- freyr 12y ago5. They have $700B, and even they can't they afford more than a "thanks but no thanks."