2 ms·
"There is no relationship between fluid intake and hydration" is a very odd statement that doesn't appear to be ever followed up on and is on the surface utter
by plorkyeran 12y ago
"There is no relationship between fluid intake and hydration" is a very odd statement that doesn't appear to be ever followed up on and is on the surface utter nonsense. Is there a missing qualifier here ("fluid intake beyond 'drinking to thirst'"), or am I just missing something?
- neaanopri 12y ago> Hydration and Thermoregulation > Dogma: We must drink water in order to prevent heat illness during exercise in hot conditions. > Science: There is no relationship between fluid intake and hydration, and the incidence of heat exhaustion or heatstroke. The only correlate to core temperature is running pace. If I'm reading it correctly, there's no relationship between (fluid intake and hydration), and (the incidence of heat exhaustion or heat stroke). It's a shame English isn't associative.
- darkmighty 12y agoHow about: There's no relationship between fluid intake and hydration versus the incidence of heat exhaustion or heat stroke. Just use a different conjunction.
- plorkyeran 12y agoAh, that makes far more sense than how I'd parsed the sentence, and actually fits with the following text.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]