> I'm aware there are no science based medical schools,, no science based clinical guidelines, no research into the efficacy of science based treatments, etc S

> I'm aware there are no science based medical schools,, no science based clinical guidelines, no research into the efficacy of science based treatments, etc Since you don't actually support your argument with any data, citations, or rational points, what would you say all these things are based on? > For whatever flaws may exist with naturopathy, at least it's a real thing with legitimate practitioners. Can you please define "it's a real thing" and "legitimate" and "practitioners" in that statement? >Studied homeopathy to some extent. Which if you haven't done, you're probably not a very good doctor. Tell me again how you are able to judge what makes a good doctor? By what authority, knowledge or reasoning?