3 ms·
If you read the article, it downloads the full sized binary later. So actually the size with the emterpreter is higher
by iopq 12y ago
If you read the article, it downloads the full sized binary later. So actually the size with the emterpreter is higher
- beagle3 12y agoI commented on another thread, that I believe a future version of the emterpreter will generate the full JS back from the bytecode, thus eliminating that problem - it will increase the emterpreter size by a few tens of Ks, but that will probably by cached everywhere through CDNs. And even if it never does - it's politically close to impossible to agree on a universal bytecode, so it is extremely unlikely to happen. (Google already tried with PNaCl - if they can't pull it, I doubt anyone else can)