Ah, its not just a minor criticism of the analytic-synthetic dichotomy but a devastating identification of Kant's fatal error regarding consciousness and his th

Ah, its not just a minor criticism of the analytic-synthetic dichotomy but a devastating identification of Kant's fatal error regarding consciousness and his theory of concepts that eviscerates Kant's entire intellectual framework. Your whole "wrong or trivial" approach is an excellent example of the analytic-synthetic dichotomy "in the wild" and accepts the Kantian worldview. Your professors in grad school are wrong and either unable or unwilling to identify this fact. Did you read the article by Leonard Peikoff?