3 ms·
>There seems to be no research into carcinogenic qualities of cannabis smoke for example. Isn't part of the problem the fact that marijuana is scheduled as a d
by commandar 12y ago
>There seems to be no research into carcinogenic qualities of cannabis smoke for example.
Isn't part of the problem the fact that marijuana is scheduled as a drug so dangerous that it's incredibly difficult to do that research?
- notahacker 12y agoIllegality doesn't help, but there are jurisdictions where marijuana is legal. In fact there are plenty of studies, but the answers are so disparate that the original study authors reasonably chose not to factor them in: depending on whose studies you believe, a couple of joints a day could be a bit more likely to induce lung cancer than a few cigarettes, pose a negligible risk or even mildly reduce the risk if you're already smoking the tobacco. A bigger (although not entirely unrelated) problem than legal status is that controlling for appropriate variables is an absolute minefield when studying usage of something as heavily correlated with certain demographics, behaviours and attitudes as cannabis.
- leeoniya 12y agoMarijuana and Heroin are both Schedule 1. the reasons for this cannot possibly be objective (and aren't).