5 ms·
"there are US citizens that are being executed without even a trial" Wow! Edgy stuff. You should present your evidence, it would be the news story of the decad
by PlzSnow 12y ago
"there are US citizens that are being executed without even a trial"
Wow! Edgy stuff. You should present your evidence, it would be the news story of the decade. You do have evidence I presume? It's not as if you would write something so outlandish based purely on conspiracy theories?
- jzwinck 12y agoHave you seen this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15121879 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15121879 Two weeks later: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/anwar-al-awlakis-family-speaks-out-against-his-sons-deaths/2011/10/17/gIQA8kFssL_story.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/anwar-... Both of the above were US citizens killed by drones abroad. One of them was not even an adult yet, by US law.
- natrius 12y agoAnd, for the record, it was not the news story of the decade.
- wtbob 12y agoCombat is not execution.
- Phlarp 12y agoDropping a bomb on teenagers with a robotic airplane from a shipping container in Nevada is not combat.
- PlzSnow 12y agoIt fits the definition of "combat" used by almost everyone. And basically no-one would define it as "execution". So there's your problem there.
- Phlarp 12y ago>It fits the definition of "combat" used by almost everyone. [Citation Needed] >basically no-one would define it as "execution". I would.
- rmxt 12y ago>It fits the definition of "combat" used by almost everyone. And basically no-one would define it as "execution". So there's your problem there. A simple search would show you that your assertion is mere bravado and puffery, attempting to paint things in a black and white light. "Almost everyone" and "basically no-one" are weasel words. The issue is nuanced. Published news articles calling it execution: http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a14627/obama-lethal-presidency-0812/ http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a14627/obama-lethal-pre... http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-k... http://socialistworker.org/2013/02/12/execution-by-drone http://socialistworker.org/2013/02/12/execution-by-drone Some cross-aisle input: http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/06/drone-strikes-murder-mob-hit-or-ethical-wise-execution/ http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/06/drone-strikes-murder-mob... Academic journals debating the implications of drone warfare: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8381079&fileId=S0892679411000281 http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPag... http://se.asee.org/proceedings/ASEE2013/Papers2013/157.PDF http://se.asee.org/proceedings/ASEE2013/Papers2013/157.PDF http://www.e-ir.info/2013/07/18/just-war-theory-and-the-ethics-of-drone-warfare/ http://www.e-ir.info/2013/07/18/just-war-theory-and-the-ethi... A book on the topic: Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control: http://goo.gl/cghukG http://goo.gl/cghukG Though, frankly, I picture you more like the cross-section mentioned in this excerpt (pg. 210, bottom of the page): https://books.google.com/books?id=RcGZ_x96exgC&lpg=PA210&ots=8XI2wpKm2P&pg=PA210#v=onepage&q&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=RcGZ_x96exgC&lpg=PA210&ots...
- PlzSnow 12y agoIf the only people agreeing with you are Glenn Greenwald, Socialist Worker and Esquire, then maybe your argument has a problem.
- PlzSnow 12y agoYour definition of execution would not be recognised by any sensible person or institution.
- thatsjustcrazy 12y agoAre you going to provide the definition used by all sensible people and institutions?
- thatsjustcrazy 12y agoNo response and a single down vote. Real mystery where that came from.
- PlzSnow 12y ago"Real mystery where that came from." I hope you're not saying I'm one of them/a spook/lizardman. Because I really like this website and it depresses me that it's slowly being infected with the conspiracy mindset.
- thatsjustcrazy 12y agoSorry, what in the world are you talking about? You are acting strange and paranoid and refuse to answer a simple question.
- PlzSnow 12y agoIt's not up to the person arguing the status quo to prove the status quo. It's up to person with the extraordinary theory to provide the extraordinary evidence.