3 ms·
Would You Pay $199 for a Mobile Twitter Device With “Lifetime” Service?
- JCThoughtscream 17y agoThe answer to "would you pay?" for any dedicated, single-purpose consumer electronic: NO. If it only does one thing, it's effectively an expensive paperweight - except that I'm sure I'm not the only one that uses my cell phone as a paperweight as well as a phone, so it's even worse than a paperweight! The apps market is huge for a reason - let's listen to that lesson.
- Zev 17y agoThe answer to "would you pay?" for any dedicated, single-purpose consumer electronic: Yes. If the device did enough for me. I have a Kindle, which can only read documents. I still have and use an old iPod that can only play music (no games or fart apps?! That thing must be useless). I have a television which can only output video (what do you mean, it can't record what its displaying?!), etc. All these devices - that can ultimately only do one thing - serve me just fine. That isn't to say that every single-purpose device will have a widespread market; the ebook reader market is very much a niche - and so is this market, Twitter anywhere without a cell phone contract. And there's nothing wrong with serving a niche.
- DanielStraight 17y agoFor all the people out there with Twitter but no cell phone... all 3 of them.