Spiegel is at least saying things slanderous of other people, whilst our boy Zuckerbeg expresses his willingness to share private information like social securi

Spiegel is at least saying things slanderous of other people, whilst our boy Zuckerbeg expresses his willingness to share private information like social security numbers and other things to his friends of his own site's users: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/ Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard Zuck: Just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They "trust me" Zuck: Dumb fucks What are you going to do about it? Nothing will happen. Both of these guys are doing well and providing return to the already rich, and that's the way this world works. edit: commenter above deleted his comment sadly, for whatever it's worth, it was: > A case in point is Snapchat, the disappearing-message service. Last spring, emails that its chief executive wrote a few years ago to his Stanford fraternity brothers surfaced. They were contemptuous of women to a degree that is unquotable in a newspaper. But not unquotable on HN: http://valleywag.gawker.com/fuck-bitches-get-leid-the-sleazy-frat-emails-of-snap-1582604137 http://valleywag.gawker.com/fuck-bitches-get-leid-the-sleazy... Spiegel's "fuckbitchesgetleid" tagline sums up the theme of the e-mails.