He does not raise that topic, but as I see it, that's a strength of the article. It questions the utility of fuel cell hydrogen cars entirely on technical groun

He does not raise that topic, but as I see it, that's a strength of the article. It questions the utility of fuel cell hydrogen cars entirely on technical grounds, providing good arguments for why that is not a good technology to bet on in the future, from someone that has participated in developing said technology. This gives much more weight to his arguments than if he had started to discuss how this is some plot to keep the petroleum infrastructure in place. Instead the article gives solid arguments for technical minded people, that can be used in political discussions elsewhere