4 ms·
I am nearsighted and it's not quite accurate. The optics is probably correct, however brain attempts to sharpen the image, so the perceived result is not just b
by asgard1024 12y ago
I am nearsighted and it's not quite accurate. The optics is probably correct, however brain attempts to sharpen the image, so the perceived result is not just blurred. Especially the light sources - I see somewhat fuzzy spiky balls instead of evenly shaded blotches.
- wongarsu 12y ago>Especially the light sources - I see somewhat fuzzy spiky balls instead of evenly shaded blotches. Are you talking about this effect: http://www.stfmc.de/misc/diffcontrarefl/diffreflf23p0fby8p0t1p6b1i400.jpg http://www.stfmc.de/misc/diffcontrarefl/diffreflf23p0fby8p0t... That effect is purely optical and as far as I know everyone experiences that in the right light conditions. Evidently even cameras are not exempt. But you're right, my eyesight is also much better than that simulator would make people believe, and the brain is certainly a part of that.
- asgard1024 12y agoI am not sure. It may contribute to it, but I still think the effect I see is something different. Most apparent it is when I am looking into a LED light with my bare eyes, compared to the unfocused camera. It really looks like the brain would amplify the small differences between neigbouring "pixels" in attempt to focus the image.