5 ms·
Whoa, seriously? I'm going to guess you're joking since they probably implemented "customer order of amount x".
by codygman 12y ago
Whoa, seriously? I'm going to guess you're joking since they probably implemented "customer order of amount x".
- jboggan 12y agoEdit: they've fixed this now. I'm not joking, click on it and try to pay. It shows an invoice of ($5,000), a.k.a. $5000 negative dollars. I didn't enter real payment information to see what happens next because of really idiotic interpretations of what constitutes "hacking", but it is a really bad design choice on their part that took me about half a second to find. Founder, if you're reading this: was this an in-house build or did you outsource this?
- edmack 12y agoThe answer is probably they spent around two days building this before demand grew left them zero time to improve infrastructure. Which is more or less good.
- jboggan 12y agoLess good? Infrastructure breaking because of load is one thing (concurrency/DB issues) but nothing like this should ever be exposed to the user on general principle.