3 ms·

I hate to feed the troll but... What the hell are acidic or low oxygen environments, and "stagnant energy"? Do you think that the environment is getting less

I hate to feed the troll but... What the hell are acidic or low oxygen environments, and "stagnant energy"? Do you think that the environment is getting less oxygenated, or more acidic? Is our world getting more stagnant? I got that you ignore clinical trials for some reason, but outside of that, can you test for these so-called other factors of cancer? What do they look like? From an epidemiological point of view, can you prevent them?

briantakita 12y ago
> What the hell are acidic or low oxygen environments, and "stagnant energy". Organisms with Aerobic (high oxygen) vs organisms with anaerobic (low oxygen) metabolic processes within the human body. Stagnant Energy is a holistic term to mean stuff that doesn't flow. Think of a knot in your back as "stagnant energy". In a healthy back, the muscles would distribute evenly. > I got that you ignore clinical trials for some reason, but outside of that, can you test for these so-called other factors of cancer? What do they look like? From an epidemiological point of view, can you prevent them? I don't know if you can even isolate causes with precision. I also question the utility of isolating causes. If you can live a healthy lifestyle, with low stress, a natural diet, low pollution, then I would intuitively think that you will have less disease. The problem is in the western world, intuition is demonized due to our cultural bias.
- robbiep 12y ago
  > Organisms with Aerobic (high oxygen) vs organisms with anaerobic (low oxygen) metabolic processes within the human body. That line just has no meaning when applied to physiology. The partial pressure of O2 at the level of the cell is between 3-5mmHg O2. This changes barely at all whether the body is hyper oxygenated (ie hooked up to high flow O2 in a hospital) or in the middle of a marathon. The idea that there are 'low oxygen' centres in our tissues is rediculous pseudoscience. Ie, terms that are sprouted with no meaning. And what do you mean by organisms? How basic is your understanding of human biology? Do you mean cells? It still has no meaning! >I would intuitively think Well that's the problem. Life doesn't work by intuition no matter how lovely it may feel to be living with the holistic anti science mindset. Facts are facts and the facts are a 'holistic/naturalistic' lifestyle, whatever that may mean these days, is not going to prevent or cure cancer any more Than the 'normal' methods of stopping smoking, exercising and remaining in a reasonable weight range

briantakita 12y ago

> What the hell are acidic or low oxygen environments, and "stagnant energy". Organisms with Aerobic (high oxygen) vs organisms with anaerobic (low oxygen) metabolic processes within the human body. Stagnant Energy is a holistic term to mean stuff that doesn't flow. Think of a knot in your back as "stagnant energy". In a healthy back, the muscles would distribute evenly. > I got that you ignore clinical trials for some reason, but outside of that, can you test for these so-called other factors of cancer? What do they look like? From an epidemiological point of view, can you prevent them? I don't know if you can even isolate causes with precision. I also question the utility of isolating causes. If you can live a healthy lifestyle, with low stress, a natural diet, low pollution, then I would intuitively think that you will have less disease. The problem is in the western world, intuition is demonized due to our cultural bias.

robbiep 12y ago
> Organisms with Aerobic (high oxygen) vs organisms with anaerobic (low oxygen) metabolic processes within the human body. That line just has no meaning when applied to physiology. The partial pressure of O2 at the level of the cell is between 3-5mmHg O2. This changes barely at all whether the body is hyper oxygenated (ie hooked up to high flow O2 in a hospital) or in the middle of a marathon. The idea that there are 'low oxygen' centres in our tissues is rediculous pseudoscience. Ie, terms that are sprouted with no meaning. And what do you mean by organisms? How basic is your understanding of human biology? Do you mean cells? It still has no meaning! >I would intuitively think Well that's the problem. Life doesn't work by intuition no matter how lovely it may feel to be living with the holistic anti science mindset. Facts are facts and the facts are a 'holistic/naturalistic' lifestyle, whatever that may mean these days, is not going to prevent or cure cancer any more Than the 'normal' methods of stopping smoking, exercising and remaining in a reasonable weight range