2 ms·
The issue is the nature of the h1b: if you lose your job, you're immediately kicked out. This gives employers much more leverage over their employees, allowing
by mjmahone17 12y ago
The issue is the nature of the h1b: if you lose your job, you're immediately kicked out. This gives employers much more leverage over their employees, allowing them to suppress wages. It's the nature of the h1b, which doesn't encourage people to invest in and make roots in the country they emigrate to, the problem. On the other hand, there's very little evidence that there's a "fixed" number of jobs in the country: allowing more people in likely causes more opportunities, especially if they have children, buy a house, etc.
There are a few possible solutions to this, such as:
- Make it so once you have an h1b, you have the right to stay in the US for at least 1 year, whether your job is terminated, and make it easy for another employer to take over your h1b. This gives immigrants leverage over a bad employer, in the form of being able to go somewhere that will pay them more.
- Make h1bs go to the highest bidders: each company says what salary they're going to give the h1b holder, and those companies paying the most get the visas.
- mc32 12y agoIllegal immigrants can also be deported and have this hanging around their neck throughout their stay. So I don't think it's that. I think the middle class and upper classes say they believe in principles, except when believing those principles will affect their way of life. For example, in SF, kids from areas with historically low scholastic performance are bused into schools with better performance, the hope is that aptitude will 'rub off'. Upper class SFers, are for this, it's socially responsible, but they put their own kids in private schools --the middle class immigrants I speak to, wish they could send their children to schools in their neighborhood, rather than ending up in a random school where performance is suspect.