3 ms·
I'll be the first to admit that I didn't really get the upshot of this article, but it seemed like they were trying to figure out a way to get more consultants
by warcher 12y ago
I'll be the first to admit that I didn't really get the upshot of this article, but it seemed like they were trying to figure out a way to get more consultants into the startup business.
As somebody who does a lot of startup stuff, and enough consulting to have an opinion or two about it, the risk/reward matrix for consultants messing with risky entrepreneurial ventures (presumably with founders you do not know very, very well) is something to be feared. Startups are almost by definition broke and on the edge of survival at all times, which makes them super, super bad clients. Give me somebody with real customers who needs to make the pain stop all day long.
- j4pe 12y agoI'd been looking at things from the developer side of the table so long, I wanted to explore the problem that people who need contractors face. Good point re: risk/reward. Guess I just decided to use a founder as my example and then ran with it. But I agree - clients paying you with revenue (or at least investment) are preferable.