3 ms·

I'd argue that the best protection is the advice of a lawyer, and not to mix trust with financial matters. History is strewn with tales of people who trusted ot

I'd argue that the best protection is the advice of a lawyer, and not to mix trust with financial matters. History is strewn with tales of people who trusted other people with their money.

darkarmani 12y ago
> I'd argue that the best protection is the advice of a lawyer That advice turns into: "You could fight this and possibly win, but it would take a year and it would cost more than you'd get back." I get what you are saying. You definitely can't really "trust" anyone, but there are so many ways to legally screw you that I'm not sure you can trust protection using a lawyer.