The Slate article struck me as a tongue-in-cheek dig at the Obama administration. For example: "Drupal's defenders are eerily reminiscent of those movement De

The Slate article struck me as a tongue-in-cheek dig at the Obama administration. For example: "Drupal's defenders are eerily reminiscent of those movement Democrats who were constantly knocking at your front door in the summer of 2008." or "If Drupal were a piece of legislation, it would be the farm bill" No one should take comments like that as a serious criticism of Drupal or the Whitehouse's use of Drupal; it's poking fun at Obama supporters. It's a joke.