In the examples I see nothing overly compelling which would justify fragmenting the mind share. Some of them could possible be considered for alexandria https:

In the examples I see nothing overly compelling which would justify fragmenting the mind share. Some of them could possible be considered for alexandria https://common-lisp.net/project/alexandria/ https://common-lisp.net/project/alexandria/. Admittedly I am not sure how alive development is but it certainly would be worth breathing new life into as it is probably the most heavily used CL library. As things like STM and lazy which Clojure has, they have been implemented at the library level for CL. https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-stm/ https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-stm/ The beauty about a Lisp is that you can easily add so much on top of the language that will feel as if it was always there. CLOS is a good example of this. In the case of JVM with CLojure, and of course others will disagree, I don't think accessing the Java ecosystem is a good thing. The mindset there is monolith "Enterprise Solutions" "Inversion of Control frameworks" which invariable mean systems that are so complex the authors don't even understand them and lets write XML above all else. Also if you want CL->Javascript; Parenscript.