3 ms·
> Someone explain to me when "an informed choice" would ever come to the conclusion of, "Encryption? Not Necessary!" I've been informed that encrypted web traf
by warkdarrior 12y ago
> Someone explain to me when "an informed choice" would ever come to the conclusion of, "Encryption? Not Necessary!"
I've been informed that encrypted web traffic costs money for the certificate and for additional server hardware. Thus I made the informed choice to use HTTP/2.0 without encryption.
- tracker1 12y agoThey should have made the secure channel for encryption over HTTP/2 use DNSSEC, then you could roll your own keys, no CA authority needed (beyond DNS)
- nickysielicki 12y ago>encrypted web traffic costs money for the certificate and for additional server hardware 1.) You can make and self sign your own cert. As another poster pointed out, there's also distributed solutions. 2.) When we let standards that are going to be in-place for at least a decade be manipulated by the hardware costs at their inception, it's a bad standard.