4 ms·
FWIW, I believe you intended to say "It's double-negative elimination that doesN'T hold constructively...". (Which is correct, and what I was about to point ou
by Chinjut 12y ago
FWIW, I believe you intended to say "It's double-negative elimination that doesN'T hold constructively...".
(Which is correct, and what I was about to point out until I saw you already did!)
- cottonseed 12y agoYes, I mean't "... doesN'T hold constructively". Thanks for catching that! Too late to edit the post.