3 ms·
I must agree with Nodesocket in regards to pricing. I don't think users will pay for it just because it's "beautiful". You might want to focus on the more enter
by pan69 12y ago
I must agree with Nodesocket in regards to pricing. I don't think users will pay for it just because it's "beautiful". You might want to focus on the more enterprise customers.
Adding to this, I don't understand your current pricing structure. The only difference the packages seem to have is storage. I get it, pay for what you don't use is a great way of making money but I don't believe customers are still falling for this. Why not simply pay for the storage you're using?
- PhilipClifton 12y agoThere are a few reasons we don't offer that payment structure. - It would be hard to monitor. - We want people to free to host even their smallest repositories. - Stripe doesn't allow it. Thanks for your feedback.