3 ms·
If the DNA is just used for uniqueness identification like finger prints then I don't see the argument. People have learned to wear gloves in crimes to avoid f
by brixon 12y ago
If the DNA is just used for uniqueness identification like finger prints then I don't see the argument.
People have learned to wear gloves in crimes to avoid finger print collections. With DNA, they will need hair nets, exfoliate and more skin coverage to avoid detection.
- spiralpolitik 12y agoOr alternatively spread so much random DNA around the crime scene that its impossible to sequence all the samples. Reasonable doubt in a can. (I think 'Almost Human' had something like this in one of the episodes)
- jackjello 12y ago> If the DNA is just used for uniqueness identification like finger prints then I don't see the argument. Your fingerprints don't tell me anything about your mother, your medical history or future, or hers. Unlike fingerprints, when someone takes your DNA, they search your entire family.