3 ms·
>He is not qualified to say that, What about Bryan Clark? Is he? http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/submarines/2015/01/23/submarines-warfare-unders
by fnordfnordfnord 12y ago
>He is not qualified to say that,
What about Bryan Clark? Is he?
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/submarines/2015/01/23/submarines-warfare-undersea-technology-navy-csba/22221565/ http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/submarines/20...
>There is not much danger that these new technologies will be able to detect a sub in our lifetime.
Really? Are you qualified to say that?
- bubbleHead 12y agoSource: US Navy submarine nuclear reactor officer, 20+ years
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoI don't know you, nor do I know Clark, or any of the others, >>"We need to think about a new strategy for undersea warfare," said Bryan Clark, a former submariner and Navy strategist now with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. This Clark guy, writing for DefenseNews claims to have been on a sub, and a place named the CSBA hired him. The trouble here is that I can't see why I should take either of yours or their assertions at face value. I don't know what their angle is, nor yours.