4 ms·
Outstanding. It's like a ridiculous Law & Order episode where the defendant goes "I wasn't even in town that night." "So what's your face doing on all of these
by omegaham 12y ago
Outstanding. It's like a ridiculous Law & Order episode where the defendant goes "I wasn't even in town that night."
"So what's your face doing on all of these security cameras at the scene of the crime?"
"... uh..."
- shpx 12y agoso just to be clear, because I find this hard to believe, they are straight up, 100% lying? Or is this taking some hash generating code out of context or something?
- throwaway41597 12y agoIt's hard to judge without digging into this spaghetti mess of files. But having the word retarget in your code seems like straight up lying to me. Tracking is more ambiguous a word and I couldn't find where they define the userid. But however it is generated, it reads like it's unique. And in order to retarget users, you'd have to track which products they've viewed in the first place, that would imply storing browsing history (they deny storing user info as well) and uniquely identifying users across websites. Given the coding style, I don't think the person(s) who wrote this code is/are doing anything clever other than what it seems.
- shpx 12y agoso just to be clear, because I find this hard to believe, they are straight up, 100% lying? Or is this taking some hash generating code out of context or something?