2 ms·
Well, if such a bytecode were being standardized, someone would surely write a shim JS library to convert it to JavaScript on browsers that didn't have native s
by comex 12y ago
Well, if such a bytecode were being standardized, someone would surely write a shim JS library to convert it to JavaScript on browsers that didn't have native support yet. And I think the idea of making a binary format would be more popular for a sublanguage which is essentially guaranteed to be machine-generated and inscrutable, especially given that I've seen a lot of commenters here and elsewhere have a knee-jerk reaction against the idea of using JavaScript syntax, than for HTML/CSS/JavaScript, which have a long history of being written and read manually without any (de)compilation steps, even if most big webapps are minified.
- beagle3 12y agoBut it works the other way around: it will not be standardized before there's an implementation. If it ever happens (which I think is unlikely), the standardization will follow the shim. And the knee jerk reactions are meaningless. The people who ship stuff don't seem to mind, and they are the ones who make things matter.