I image reviewers would typically know who the author is, or be able to discover it quickly, if they are in fact familiar enough with the field to meaningfully

I image reviewers would typically know who the author is, or be able to discover it quickly, if they are in fact familiar enough with the field to meaningfully review the work. Similarly, authors can often guess who reviewers are based on the nature of the review. I don't think a double-blind strategy really addresses the problems with modern peer review.