Apparently "think different" is a one-way view these days. In any case this is not a case of discrimination as much as it is a case of poor screening and hirin

Apparently "think different" is a one-way view these days. In any case this is not a case of discrimination as much as it is a case of poor screening and hiring. For a lobbyist position (a face and a voice of a company towards legislators) Apple should have vetoed him based on possible conflicts of interest with company policies and social stance.