4 ms·
-CURRENT machines shouldn't be "on the net" in any meaningful way unless you've calculated the risks and are willing to accept them. I don't get this attitude
by garrettheaver 12y ago
-CURRENT machines shouldn't be "on the net" in any meaningful way unless you've calculated the risks and are willing to accept them.
I don't get this attitude of people who think projects should fit their model of how things should be named. Many of us have no problem understanding the labelling, its really fairly intuitive. We also have no problem understanding alternative schemes used in other projects. Just because its different to what you're used to doesn't make it wrong.
Whether or not I have respect for them matter quite a lot if they're trying to market security related products. Basing themselves on -CURRENT and not understanding the potential consequences speaks volumes about that organisation or teams competency in their chosen field.
- tracker1 12y agoGiven that... wouldn't -DEV or -EDGE or -UNSTABLE make more sense?