4 ms·
it is available for reading even without the account. At least works for me.
by houseofshards 12y ago
it is available for reading even without the account. At least works for me.
- pdkl95 12y agoWow. They took the javascript-only, broken page stupidity even further than current fad frameworks that only serve up an empty <body> tag. This linkedin page doesn't even include a body at all: <html><head> <script type="text/javascript">...</script> </head></html>
- toothbrush 12y agoPeople who design such brazenly idiotic things should be promptly keelhauled.
- ryan-allen 12y agoThe web embraces random hacks like this, it wouldn't be what it is without people doing stuff like this!
- emp_zealoth 12y agoOh no! It wouldn't be a mess of glitching, flickering, sliding about "dynamic" content slots that would actually work better as a plain static website... There are webpages that cause firefox to need more RAM than AAA games Sarcasm for (I hope) sarcasm
- ryan-allen 12y agoWell, I agree with that in particular. I find it very unsettling when I can't scroll a website on my i7 and GTX670 at home without it stuttering around.
- lucaspiller 12y agoOn mobile first it tries to get me to login, then tries to get me to download the app, then says I have to login to read the article :-)