2 ms·
While I'll admit that my personal project, subuser.org isn't yet at the stage of 100% sandboxed, this title is excedingly misleading. There are lots of projects
by timthelion 12y ago
While I'll admit that my personal project, subuser.org isn't yet at the stage of 100% sandboxed, this title is excedingly misleading. There are lots of projects that have done this allready: http://www.jann.cc/2014/09/06/sandboxing_proprietary_applications_with_docker.html http://www.jann.cc/2014/09/06/sandboxing_proprietary_applica..., https://github.com/Kagami/kagome https://github.com/Kagami/kagome
- alexlarsson 12y agoThe title is a bit hyperbolic, true. There have been various ways to try to contain desktop apps over the years. But I wouldn't call them "apps" really, they may get the sandboxing aspects down, but they don't have the simple-to-install, well-integrated behaviour that you'd want for something like an "app" system. Most of them basically run the app in its own VNC or Xserver instance, with zero interaction with the rest of the session.