3 ms·
Normal RDDs won't benefit from this optimisation, only DataFrames? Is that because using this new DSL allows Spark to more precisely plan what needs to happen
by century19 12y ago
Normal RDDs won't benefit from this optimisation, only DataFrames? Is that because using this new DSL allows Spark to more precisely plan what needs to happen for DataFrames?
I guess this means DataFrames should be used all the time in the future, or will there still be a reason to use plain RDDs in the future?
You guys are doing great work !
- rxin 12y agoIndeed, DataFrames give Spark more semantic information about the data transformations, and thus can be better optimized. We envision this to become the primary API users use. You can still fall back to the vanilla RDD API (afterall DataFrame can be viewed as RDD[Row]) for stuff that is not expressible with DataFrames.
- rkrzr 12y agoCould you give an example of something that could not be expressed with DataFrames? Would e.g. tree-structured data be a bad fit for DataFrames, since it doesn't fit well with the tabular nature?