4 ms·
You might get more results searching for "deletionism vs inclusionism", which seems to be the most widely used name for the debate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by mkremins 12y ago
You might get more results searching for "deletionism vs inclusionism", which seems to be the most widely used name for the debate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in...
- angersock 12y agoWhat's the current general stance on that these days I wonder? What's the prevailing wind?
- VLM 12y agoThe deletionists won and quite a few people refuse to participate anymore. Which leads to declining quality of article and moderation...
- chris_mahan 12y agoI was one of those who left. I let my adminship elapse after 10 years. I also don't contribute much to SO, or to any SE properties, despite being on the early public beta. (remember the signup as a google spreadhseet). I'm ID 479 on SO.
- merrua 12y agoYep. And the deletionists where more often the "majority" culture and male, which resulted in a feedback loop for the nonminority and female. New minority turn up, have a bad experience and leaves. I think it was studied let me see if I can find the paper. I know the results were replicated with comment bots. Update, not the ones I was thinking of but a good read. HBS Cases: How Wikipedia Works (or Doesn't) http://hbswk.hbs.edu/pdf/item/5605.pdf http://hbswk.hbs.edu/pdf/item/5605.pdf
- indymike 12y agoThat discussion has been deleted.