4 ms·
Sorry messed that up, you're right that the '74 builder catalog was very inclusive/generic but somehow the '76 one overshadowed this already in my memory (simil
by mxfh 12y ago
Sorry messed that up, you're right that the '74 builder catalog was very inclusive/generic but somehow the '76 one overshadowed this already in my memory (similiar models, strictly for lads).
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?C=c76uk http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?C=c76uk
http://worldbricks.com/en/my-instructions/download/file.html?fid=87.4025 http://worldbricks.com/en/my-instructions/download/file.html... [PDF]
Yet the '74 homemaker one is clearly aimed at girls, and only mentions boys in the foreword.
http://helpemptymyattic.co.uk/vintage-lego-little-girls-think-big-leaflet-catalogue-1974 http://helpemptymyattic.co.uk/vintage-lego-little-girls-thin...
My point is LEGO had quite the on/off approach with gender in their advertising for decades already, and yes I like the 1981 one.