4 ms·
According to the article you won't be able to do that; although not all extensions have to go through addons.mozilla.org they do all have to be digitally signed
by smhenderson 12y ago
According to the article you won't be able to do that; although not all extensions have to go through addons.mozilla.org they do all have to be digitally signed.
There are exceptions - something about "in house, corporate" (whatever that means), developer editions of Firefox and nightly builds. But if I read correctly users of the current, stock Firefox will not be able to suppress the signature check when installing addons.
- chimeracoder 12y agoTo be honest, I don't think people who aren't capable of or interested in downloading a developer edition should be installing unsigned extensions. If there's an unsigned extension you really can't live without, just download Iceweasel - problem solved. It's not like this will be that hard to get around for people who know what they're doing, so I'm not too worried about this change.
- smhenderson 12y agoI don't completely disagree, and I know computer users have always been treated as separate groups based on skills. That said it's unsettling to me to see a group like Mozilla officially treating users this way. Software freedom is for everyone and, IMHO, treating one group differently than another with regards to this freedom just legitimises the walled garden concept further. As the article said, it's hard to call them a community or foundation when they turn around and announce a very company-like policy such as this...
- blueskin_ 12y agoMozilla took the power user out around the back with the shotgun long, long ago, unfortunately; just the latest sacrifice in their futile war to copy everything chrome does (and yet the PHBs making these decisions still wonder why they are haemorrhaging market share). Time to move to Pale Moon.