3 ms·
Fair call, however I'd argue in that case your objection is to the word sound, not Photoshop. How about "The Photoshop of acoustic spaces"?
by sjwright 12y ago
Fair call, however I'd argue in that case your objection is to the word sound, not Photoshop.
How about "The Photoshop of acoustic spaces"?
- code_duck 12y agoThat's suggestion has made me rethink my interpretation. I was rejecting 'photoshop' applied to sound because sound is a medium that necessarily involves time, like video, whereas a single frame 2d image has no notion or possibility of time being involved. However, in rethinking this, one could make an valid analogy of a 'photoshop filter' applied to the acoustic design of a restaurant. Given that the restaurant's layout is static, it's more like a filter on a 2-d single frame image than a filter applied to dynamic sound or video.