4 ms·

You know, I would've thought it evident by now that it's not exactly what any thinking person expects them to say. It's sort of evident from the existence of so

You know, I would've thought it evident by now that it's not exactly what any thinking person expects them to say. It's sort of evident from the existence of so many: - articles, such as: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/18/60minutes/main4675524_page2.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/18/60minutes/main4675... - blog posts, such as: http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/12/24/kip-hawley-quot-no-the-tsa-is-necessary-because-this-is-war-quot.aspx http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/12/24/ki... - web comics, such as the xkcd one I don't really understand what you're trying to accomplish here, but whatever it is, you're not helping your case by stating that xkcdsucks is funnier than xkcd. Yes, the humor in xkcd might be extremely nerdy at times, but at least it's not hateful trollery.

tptacek 17y ago
xkcdsucks is hateful trollery? (Oh. Sorry. Didn't notice your nick. ;)
- CodeMage 17y ago
  You know, it could be my fault. I assumed you were talking about http://www.xkcdsucks.com/ http://www.xkcdsucks.com/ If you were talking about that, I rest my case. On the other hand, maybe you were talking about http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/ http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/ The author of that is at least trying to say something. As a matter of fact, he's saying a lot, without contributing much. As for the nick: brilliant deduction ;)
  - tptacek 17y ago
    I'm talking about xkcdsucks.blogspot.com. It is f'ing hilarious. Try starting here: http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2008/10/frequently-asked-irritating-self.html http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2008/10/frequently-asked-irrit...